In Defense of Our America: The Fight for Civil Liberties in the Age of Terror
by Anthony Romero and Dina Temple-Raston
published by Harper Collins
New York, NY
copyright 2007
Don't read this Book.
The book is hard to follow as through out the book the author attempts to discuss each topic some in each chapter. Often the connection is not clear. The author is correct on some subjects such as torture, but wrong on others. In discussing the South Dakota abortion ban he talks about their leader Fire Thunder being opposed to it. If you read what she says, she is really saying I am ineffective in stopping rape and violence against women so I will kill the innocent. Also he often claims that science supports evolution but does not present any evidence (because there is none). It becomes evident in he Afterward for those of us who did not know the author before reading the book that his hatred of God most likely stems from the fact that he is a homosexual.
Showing posts with label What not to Read. Show all posts
Showing posts with label What not to Read. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Glenn Beck's Common Sense
Glenn Beck's Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government
by Glenn Beck
Published by Threshold Editions
New York, NY
copyright 2009
Read with Caution
If you read this carefully you will find that the overall theme of the Glenn Beck portion is stand down no matter what. He makes many good points but does not have a good grasp of all the issues he covers.
The demonizes militias in the introduction. The Constitution calls them necessary. The does not really understand what inflation is. He says that America has succeed because of freedom and capitalism with no mention of the blessings of God.
He thinks that the system that the founders adopted was to push candidates to the center. This is a symptom of the two party system not an intent of the founders the wanted many candidates and most were at the founding against parties at all. Term limits will not help without more parties either we would just be getting a new lessor of two evils. We need good candidates to step up and run.
He fails to identify both the Democrats and Republicans, the political right and the political left as being pro-New World Order. That they are both controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations.
He claims that the government has no powers that we the people do not have. OK. Who can I tax?
He does not think that there are or will be FEMA camps. There were no camps when they rounded up the Japanese Americans during WWII.
by Glenn Beck
Published by Threshold Editions
New York, NY
copyright 2009
Read with Caution
If you read this carefully you will find that the overall theme of the Glenn Beck portion is stand down no matter what. He makes many good points but does not have a good grasp of all the issues he covers.
The demonizes militias in the introduction. The Constitution calls them necessary. The does not really understand what inflation is. He says that America has succeed because of freedom and capitalism with no mention of the blessings of God.
He thinks that the system that the founders adopted was to push candidates to the center. This is a symptom of the two party system not an intent of the founders the wanted many candidates and most were at the founding against parties at all. Term limits will not help without more parties either we would just be getting a new lessor of two evils. We need good candidates to step up and run.
He fails to identify both the Democrats and Republicans, the political right and the political left as being pro-New World Order. That they are both controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations.
He claims that the government has no powers that we the people do not have. OK. Who can I tax?
He does not think that there are or will be FEMA camps. There were no camps when they rounded up the Japanese Americans during WWII.
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Winning the Future
Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract with America
by Newt Gingrich
published by Regnery Publishing, Inc
An Eagle Publishing Company
Washington, DC
Copyright 2005
Only read this book it you realize that Newt is a Counsel on Foreign anti-American globalist.
The does make a case for us being a Christian nation which is about the only thing that he gets right. All of his solutions are big government solutions. They mostly involve the military or ways the government can gain more information on us.
In chapter four he claims to talk about bring the courts back under the Constitution but he never mentions the Constitution solution found in Article II section 3.
The only place in the book that he actually uses the Constitution to support being for or against something in on pg. 182.
He talk about balancing the budget and cutting spending but with not mention of limiting spending to the things mentioned in Article I section 8.
He claims to be a Christian but talks about want to learn more about how life evolved on the planet.
He also claims on pg. 138 that the congress cut spending while he was Speaker but on the same page he says that spending grew by 2.3%.
Forget the left right paradigm that the author likes to promote and realize most politicians unless they are true Constitutionalists want larger government. They only differ on what they want government to control and how fast they want it to grew.
by Newt Gingrich
published by Regnery Publishing, Inc
An Eagle Publishing Company
Washington, DC
Copyright 2005
Only read this book it you realize that Newt is a Counsel on Foreign anti-American globalist.
The does make a case for us being a Christian nation which is about the only thing that he gets right. All of his solutions are big government solutions. They mostly involve the military or ways the government can gain more information on us.
In chapter four he claims to talk about bring the courts back under the Constitution but he never mentions the Constitution solution found in Article II section 3.
The only place in the book that he actually uses the Constitution to support being for or against something in on pg. 182.
He talk about balancing the budget and cutting spending but with not mention of limiting spending to the things mentioned in Article I section 8.
He claims to be a Christian but talks about want to learn more about how life evolved on the planet.
He also claims on pg. 138 that the congress cut spending while he was Speaker but on the same page he says that spending grew by 2.3%.
Forget the left right paradigm that the author likes to promote and realize most politicians unless they are true Constitutionalists want larger government. They only differ on what they want government to control and how fast they want it to grew.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)